devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / OPP: check for existing OPP list when initialising from device tree
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 10:04:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130501150403.GA20488@kahuna> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367406679-21603-3-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>

On 12:11-20130501, Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com wrote:
> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
> 
> CPUs are registered as devices and their OPPs can be initialised from
> the device tree. Whenever CPUs can be hotplugged out, the corresponding
> cpu devices are not removed. As a result all their OPPs remain intact
> even when they are offlined.
> 
> But when they are hotplugged back-in, the cpufreq along with other cpu
> related subsystem gets re-initialised. Since its almost same as secondary
> cpu being brought up, no special consideration is taken in the hotplug
> path. As a result of this the cpufreq will try to initialise the OPPs
> again though the cpu device already contains the OPPs.
> 
> This patch checks if there exist an OPP list associated with the device,
> before attempting to initialise it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/opp.c |    5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> index 4dfdc01..66d52d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> @@ -706,6 +706,11 @@ static int of_init_opp_table_from_ofnode(struct device *dev,
>  	const __be32 *val;
>  	int nr;
>  
> +	/* Check for existing list for 'dev' */
> +	dev_opp = find_device_opp(dev);
> +	if (!IS_ERR(dev_opp))
> +		return 0; /* Device OPP already initialized */
> +
It gets a little touchy here -> the normal expectation is for the OPP
entries to be populated onetime at boot.
For example - driver bug where same device was attempted twice Vs the
usecase you mention here - how'd we differentiate between the two?
>  	prop = of_find_property(of_node, "operating-points", NULL);
>  	if (!prop)
>  		return -ENODEV;
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-01 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-01 11:11 [PATCH 0/2] PM / OPP: updates to enable sharing OPPs info Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-05-01 11:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: add support to specify phandle of another node for OPP Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-05-01 14:41   ` Nishanth Menon
2013-05-01 16:28     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-05-01 16:49       ` Nishanth Menon
2013-05-13 16:12     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-05-01 11:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM / OPP: check for existing OPP list when initialising from device tree Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-05-01 15:04   ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2013-05-01 16:33     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-05-01 16:51       ` Nishanth Menon
     [not found] ` <1367406679-21603-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-21 10:00   ` [PATCH 0/2] PM / OPP: updates to enable sharing OPPs info Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-20  5:09     ` Grant Likely
2013-07-22 12:56       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 13:01       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130501150403.GA20488@kahuna \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).