From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next resend PATCH 1/6] net: cpsw: enhance pinctrl support Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 12:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20130523.121037.84357412382839522.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1369130103-743-2-git-send-email-mugunthanvnm@ti.com> <20130522.235741.135665074490271750.davem@davemloft.net> <1BAFE6F6C881BF42822005164F1491C33EBF928C@DBDE04.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1BAFE6F6C881BF42822005164F1491C33EBF928C@DBDE04.ent.ti.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: gururaja.hebbar@ti.com Cc: mugunthanvnm@ti.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, benoit.cousson@linaro.orgm, paul@pwsan.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org From: "Hebbar, Gururaja" Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 11:28:38 +0000 > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:27:41, David Miller wrote: >> From: Mugunthan V N >> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:24:58 +0530 >> >> > + priv->pins_default = pinctrl_lookup_state(priv->pinctrl, >> > + PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT); >> >> This is not indented correctly. >> >> Argument on the second, and subsequent, lines of a function call >> must start at the first column after the openning parenthesis of >> the function call itself. > > Well, if I am correct, doing so will make the line cross 80 character limit. > If you could (please I ask), can you let me know how it can be handled in > above situation. I will make the changes/corrections and re-send it. > > Thanks a lot in advance. Avoid the deep indentation by coding the basic block into a helper function.