From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] i2c: stu300: do not request a specific clock name Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 01:09:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20130523230943.GA3645@katana> References: <1369330288-14856-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <1369330288-14856-5-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1369330288-14856-5-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Mike Turquette , Arnd Bergmann , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Linus Walleij , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:31:26PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > From: Linus Walleij > > We have used the default clock associated with the block > for a long time, only heuristics in the clock system has > made this work anyway. This needs to be done away with as > we start probing this driver and its clocks exclusively > from the device tree. > > Cc: Wolfram Sang > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Acked-by: Wolfram Sang