From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@arm.com>,
Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
Achin Gupta <Achin.Gupta@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] drivers: mfd: vexpress: add timeout API to vexpress config interface
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:15:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130603131527.GC22821@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370261030.16073.5.camel@linaro1.home>
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 01:03:50PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 12:52 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:15:32AM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 13:53 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > > In case some transactions to the Serial Power Controller (SPC) are lost owing
> > > > to multiple operations handled at once by the M3 controller the OS needs to
> > > > rely on a configuration API that can time out so that failures do not result
> > > > in an unusable system.
> > > >
> > > > This patch adds a timeout API to the vexpress config programming interface,
> > > > and refactors the existing read/write functions so that they can be reused
> > > > seamlessly on top of the newly defined API.
> > >
> > > Isn't one of the main purposes of the config interface to serialise
> > > transactions to the config bus, so why would the SPC be handling
> > > multiple transactions at once? And if we can in fact loose transactions
> > > doesn't this mean we get random failures in the system? E.g. if this
> > > happened at boot in vexpress_spc_populate_opps then cpufreq will fail.
> >
> > It has more to do with firmware carrying out background operations like
> > powering up a cluster when a DVFS is requested.
>
> Would that make it drop transactions or just take a longer time to get
> around to servicing them?
It should just take longer to service them, that's what the behaviour
should be.
Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-03 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-24 12:53 [RFC PATCH 0/3] drivers: mfd: Versatile Express SPC support Lorenzo Pieralisi
[not found] ` <1369399986-15649-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-24 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] drivers: mfd: refactor the vexpress config bridge API Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-05-24 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] drivers: mfd: vexpress: add timeout API to vexpress config interface Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-06-03 10:15 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
[not found] ` <1370254532.3407.36.camel-K+mpW1F5uff9zxVx7UNMDg@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-03 11:52 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-06-03 12:03 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-06-03 13:15 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2013-05-24 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] drivers: mfd: vexpress: add Serial Power Controller (SPC) support Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130603131527.GC22821@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Achin.Gupta@arm.com \
--cc=Pawel.Moll@arm.com \
--cc=Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com \
--cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tixy@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).