From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bump version number to 1.4.0 Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 09:06:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20130615080647.84B1B3E0A2E@localhost> References: <1370970685-21755-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <20130615011245.GB9218@voom.bne.redhat.com> <51BBD9FA.2040503@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51BBD9FA.2040503-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Stephen Warren , David Gibson Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, Stephen Warren List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:05:30 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/14/2013 07:12 PM, David Gibson wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:11:25AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> From: Stephen Warren > >> > >> Many useful new features have been added to dtc since the last > >> release. Projects that use dtc wish to test the version number to > >> determine which features are available. Increment the version > >> number to allow this. > > > > Hrm. We should make a new release. But I don't think we should > > bump the version without actuall rolling a release. > > I figured that applying this patch /would/ be making a new release; > well - apply the patch, and create a tag with the same version. Yes, that's what I was assuming you meant too. g.