From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] pinctrl: single: adopt pinctrl sleep mode management Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 05:03:41 -0700 Message-ID: <20130617120340.GE10305@atomide.com> References: <1369995191-20855-1-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> <1369995191-20855-2-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Hebbar Gururaja , Haojian Zhuang , Kevin Hilman , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , "davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Russell King - ARM Linux , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Vaibhav Bedia , sudhakar.raj@ti.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org * Linus Walleij [130617 04:38]: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Hebbar Gururaja > wrote: > > > Make pinctrl-single able to handle suspend/resume events and change > > hogged pins states accordingly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hebbar Gururaja > > Cc: Linus Walleij > > Noone said anything about this patch, but it looks very straight-forward > to me and seems sound so I have applied it. > > If Tony or Haojian has strong feelings about it I will dequeue it. I don't like the hogged pins at all as they prevent me from unloading pinctrl-single.. But the patch seems fine to me: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren