Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix potential merge conflict for dw_apb_timer_of

["Heiko Stübner" <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>]

Hi Pavel,

Am Dienstag, 18. Juni 2013, 17:02:44 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> Hi!
> 
> > >The following 2 patches will eliminate the need for the patch in John
> > >Stultz's tree. If there is to be merge of the 2 trees, then the
> > >patch:
> > >
> > >dw_apb_timer_of.c: Remove parts that were picoxcell-specific
> > >
> > >can be removed from John's tree to avoid a merge-conflict.
> > >
> > >Based on arm-soc/for-next:
> > >
> > >PATCH[1/2] - Rename "dw-apb-timer-osc" and "dw-apb-timer-sp" bindings to
> > >just "dw-apb-timer"
> > >PATCH[2/2] - Fix user/system reporting by fixing read_sched_clock()
> > 
> > Pavel/Jamie: Can you take a look at these too and make sure these cover
> > what you were doing.
> 
> [It seems like Heiko Stübner was not aware of patches in the clock
> tree, so did pretty much equivalent patch.]

Correct ... I was going after what was in linux-next and the tip.git [which I 
also only saw recently at all] does not seem to be part of it. 

> Dinh's changes look good to me, but
> 
> [PATCH v2 4/4] clocksource: dw_apb_timer_of: use clocksource_of_init
> 
> does not exactly look nice: (I'm sorry I did not see original series,
> before it was merged to -soc.). The function counts number of times it
> was called, and behaves differently in each case. It is not very
> traditional kernel code at the very least.
> 
> +static int num_called;
> +static void __init dw_apb_timer_init(struct device_node *timer)
>  {
> -       struct device_node *event_timer, *source_timer;
> -
> -       event_timer = of_find_matching_node(NULL, osctimer_ids);
> -       if (!event_timer)
> -               panic("No timer for clockevent");
> -       add_clockevent(event_timer);
> -
> -       source_timer = of_find_matching_node(event_timer,
> osctimer_ids);
> -       if (!source_timer)
> -               panic("No timer for clocksource");
> -       add_clocksource(source_timer);
> -
> -       of_node_put(source_timer);
> +       switch (num_called) {
> +       case 0:
> +               pr_debug("%s: found clockevent timer\n", __func__);
> +               add_clockevent(timer);
> +               of_node_put(timer);
> +               break;
> +       case 1:
> +               pr_debug("%s: found clocksource timer\n", __func__);
> +               add_clocksource(timer);
> +               of_node_put(timer);
> +               init_sched_clock();
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               break;
> +       }
> 
> -       init_sched_clock();
> +       num_called++;
>  }
> 
> Heiko, can you take a look at John Stultz tree? We modified this area
> already... I understand you only have one timer on your silicon?

nope, my silicon has actually three timers of this type (all of them of the 
"snps,dw-apb-timer-osc" type ... which did change it seems).

But the clocksource also needs to provide the sched_clock on it.

Due to the multiple matching I came up with the numbering, because the of-
clocksource must match the timer ips multiple times and needs to use one as 
clockevent and one as clocksource.


> Would perhaps parameter on dw_apb_timer_init telling it what to do be
> better solution? I don't like the "num_called" variable too much...

The problem I see is, how do you want to distinguish between the timer used as 
clockevent and the one used as clocksource. The ip blocks are the same, so the 
dt binding must also be the same, as it only describes the hardware.

And the
CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(apb_timer, "snps,dw-apb-timer-osc", dw_apb_timer_init);
of course also matches against all the timer nodes in the dt.


Heiko