From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Ortiz Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] mfd: Palmas: Add TPS659038 PMIC support Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:41:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20130620084145.GD15667@zurbaran> References: <1371621470-22279-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> <1371621470-22279-4-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1371621470-22279-4-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Keerthy Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, ldewangan@nvidia.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, swarren@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, gg@slimlogic.co.uk List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:27:49AM +0530, Keerthy wrote: > From: J Keerthy > > The Patch adds TPS659038 PMIC support in the palmas mfd driver. > The TPS659038 has almost the same registers as of the earlier > supported variants of PALMAS family such as the TWL6035. > > The critical differences between TPS659038 and TWL6035 being: > > 1) TPS659038 has nothing related to battery charging and back up battery stuff. > 2) TPS659038 does not have does not have SMPS10(Boost) step up convertor. > 3) TPS659038 does not have Battery detection and anything related to battery. > 4) SD card detection, Battery presence detection, Vibrator, USB OTG are missing > when compared to TWL6035. > > Signed-off-by: J Keerthy > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/palmas.txt | 2 ++ > drivers/mfd/palmas.c | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) This one does not apply against mfd-next as I don't have the palmas.txt. For Grant to take this one: Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz If that creates conflicts (I already have a few palmas.c changes) then we'll have to find a way to fix them (Me taking the bindings file ?). Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/