devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
	<bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] OF: make of_property_for_each_{u32|string}() use parameters if OF is not enabled
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 06:28:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130720052809.3F0573E16E7@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130617144813.GA10582-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3298 bytes --]

On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:48:13 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> I am getting a few
> |warning: unused variable ‘p’ [-Wunused-variable]
> |warning: unused variable ‘prop’ [-Wunused-variable]
> 
> in the case where CONFIG_OF is not defined and the parameters are only
> used in the loop macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>

Applied, thanks

g.


> ---
> 
> I also made that change for of_property_for_each_string().
> 
>  include/linux/of.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index 1fd08ca..90a8811 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -323,12 +323,6 @@ extern int of_detach_node(struct device_node *);
>   */
>  const __be32 *of_prop_next_u32(struct property *prop, const __be32 *cur,
>  			       u32 *pu);
> -#define of_property_for_each_u32(np, propname, prop, p, u)	\
> -	for (prop = of_find_property(np, propname, NULL),	\
> -		p = of_prop_next_u32(prop, NULL, &u);		\
> -		p;						\
> -		p = of_prop_next_u32(prop, p, &u))
> -
>  /*
>   * struct property *prop;
>   * const char *s;
> @@ -337,11 +331,6 @@ const __be32 *of_prop_next_u32(struct property *prop, const __be32 *cur,
>   *         printk("String value: %s\n", s);
>   */
>  const char *of_prop_next_string(struct property *prop, const char *cur);
> -#define of_property_for_each_string(np, propname, prop, s)	\
> -	for (prop = of_find_property(np, propname, NULL),	\
> -		s = of_prop_next_string(prop, NULL);		\
> -		s;						\
> -		s = of_prop_next_string(prop, s))
>  
>  #else /* CONFIG_OF */
>  
> @@ -505,12 +494,20 @@ static inline int of_machine_is_compatible(const char *compat)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline const __be32 *of_prop_next_u32(struct property *prop,
> +		const __be32 *cur, u32 *pu)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline const char *of_prop_next_string(struct property *prop,
> +		const char *cur)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  #define of_match_ptr(_ptr)	NULL
>  #define of_match_node(_matches, _node)	NULL
> -#define of_property_for_each_u32(np, propname, prop, p, u) \
> -	while (0)
> -#define of_property_for_each_string(np, propname, prop, s) \
> -	while (0)
>  #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
>  
>  #ifndef of_node_to_nid
> @@ -559,6 +556,18 @@ static inline int of_property_read_u32(const struct device_node *np,
>  	return of_property_read_u32_array(np, propname, out_value, 1);
>  }
>  
> +#define of_property_for_each_u32(np, propname, prop, p, u)	\
> +	for (prop = of_find_property(np, propname, NULL),	\
> +		p = of_prop_next_u32(prop, NULL, &u);		\
> +		p;						\
> +		p = of_prop_next_u32(prop, p, &u))
> +
> +#define of_property_for_each_string(np, propname, prop, s)	\
> +	for (prop = of_find_property(np, propname, NULL),	\
> +		s = of_prop_next_string(prop, NULL);		\
> +		s;						\
> +		s = of_prop_next_string(prop, s))
> +
>  #if defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE)
>  extern void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *, struct proc_dir_entry *);
>  extern void proc_device_tree_add_prop(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct property *prop);
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 192 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-20  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-13 15:28 [RFC] OF: make of_property_for_each_u32() use parameters if OF is not enabled Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
     [not found] ` <1371137331-4652-1-git-send-email-bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-15 14:00   ` Grant Likely
2013-06-17  6:59     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-17 14:48     ` [PATCH v2] OF: make of_property_for_each_{u32|string}() " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
     [not found]       ` <20130617144813.GA10582-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-20  5:28         ` Grant Likely [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130720052809.3F0573E16E7@localhost \
    --to=grant.likely-qsej5fyqhm4dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).