From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: Add more stubs for non-OF builds Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 06:31:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20130720053111.CA86E3E16F4@localhost> References: <1371566362-9334-1-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1371566362-9334-1-git-send-email-shc_work-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Cc: Bryan Wu , Rob Herring , linux-leds-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Alexander Shiyan List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:39:22 +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > Patch adds of_get_next_child and of_get_next_available_child > stubs for non-OF builds. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan > --- > include/linux/of.h | 16 ++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h > index 1fd08ca..c086c1a 100644 > --- a/include/linux/of.h > +++ b/include/linux/of.h > @@ -366,8 +366,17 @@ static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void) > return false; > } > > -#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \ > - while (0) > +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_child( > + const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev) > +{ > + return NULL; > +} > + > +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child( > + const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev) > +{ > + return NULL; > +} > > static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name( > const struct device_node *node, > @@ -376,6 +385,9 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name( > return NULL; > } > > +#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \ > + while (0) > + Why is the for_each_child_of_node() getting moved? g. > static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np) > { > return 0; > -- > 1.8.1.5 >