From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] Handling of devicetree bindings Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 00:42:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20130721074246.GC26485@roeck-us.net> References: <20130713192647.GA3798@katana> <20130713204927.GA1124@roeck-us.net> <20130714181331.GC26513@roeck-us.net> <20130715082915.5142547a@lwn.net> <20130719154004.GA3081@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130719154004.GA3081@katana> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Wolfram Sang Cc: ksummit-2013-discuss-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 05:40:05PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:07:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > > > > Do we need a kernel summit discussion, or do we just need a good > > > document? Or, to phrase the question another way, are we lacking a > > > consensus among the clueful regarding how device tree bindings should be > > > designed, or are we simply lacking education? > > > > I think both. I fear some maintainers do not know enough about > > the subject to know if a binding should be rejected. > In this context, can the devicetree experts`please have a look into the proposed bindings for the thermal subsystem ? Thanks, Guenter