From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: kirkwood: enable S/PDIF
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:21:04 +0100
Message-ID: <20130723132104.GT24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20130723102320.56bc4555@armhf>
 <20130723084347.GP24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <20130723130622.GB9858@sirena.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130723130622.GB9858@sirena.org.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 02:06:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:43:47AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:23:20AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> > > This patch enables S/PDIF.
> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
> 
> > I'm not submitting my patch to do this because:
> 
> > (a) we don't know what effect this has on other hardware.
> 
> This patch will do absolutely nothing unless it's used in a machine
> driver which connects a S/PDIF CODEC to it.  I see no reason not to
> apply it, someone with hardware with more complex needs can always build
> on it later.

So... what if setting this bit causes the SoC to start wiggling a pin
with the SPDIF signal which has been used for a different purpose?