devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Gong <b38343@freescale.com>
To: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, shawn.guo@linaro.org,
	grant.likely@linaro.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com,
	rob@landley.net, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze100 regulator driver
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:07:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130724100717.GA7786@Robin-OptiPlex-780> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130724083041.GC4332@pengutronix.de>

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:30:41AM +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I tested your patch and had to change two things to actually make it
> work. See below...
> 
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 05:17:27PM +0800, Robin Gong wrote:
> > Add pfuze100 regulator driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <b38343@freescale.com>
> 
> (...)
> 
> > ---
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..fd259ef
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
> 
> (...)
> 
> > +static struct regulator_ops pfuze100_ldo_regulator_ops = {
> > +	.enable = regulator_enable_regmap,
> > +	.disable = regulator_disable_regmap,
> > +	.is_enabled = regulator_is_enabled_regmap,
> > +	.list_voltage = regulator_list_voltage_linear,
> > +	.set_voltage_sel = regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap,
> > +	.get_voltage_sel = regulator_get_voltage_sel_regmap,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct regulator_ops pfuze100_fixed_regulator_ops = {
> > +	.list_voltage = regulator_list_voltage_linear,
> > +};
> 
> 
> This needs:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> index 07d5a54..d0d67b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops pfuze100_ldo_regulator_ops = {
> 
>  static struct regulator_ops pfuze100_fixed_regulator_ops = {
> 	.list_voltage = regulator_list_voltage_linear,
> +	.set_voltage_sel = regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap,
>  };
> 
>  static struct regulator_ops pfuze100_sw_regulator_ops = {
> 
> 
> Otherwise the fixed_regulator VDDR isn't registered and the driver then unloads
> completely. This is at least the case for v3.10. I haven't had the chance to test
> it on v3.11-rcX. If the _regulator_do_set_voltage logic changes, then scratch this.
> 
Thanks firstly for you test with the patch. I have test it on v3.10 just now,
and can't reproduce what you saw that VDDR regulator can't be registered
successfully. I don't think fixed regulator need <set_voltage_sel>.
> > +
> > +static struct regulator_ops pfuze100_sw_regulator_ops = {
> > +	.list_voltage = regulator_list_voltage_linear,
> > +	.set_voltage_sel = regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap,
> > +	.get_voltage_sel = regulator_get_voltage_sel_regmap,
> > +	.set_voltage_time_sel = regulator_set_voltage_time_sel,
> > +	.set_ramp_delay = pfuze100_set_ramp_delay,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct regulator_ops pfuze100_swb_regulator_ops = {
> > +	.list_voltage = regulator_list_voltage_table,
> > +	.set_voltage_sel = regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap,
> > +	.get_voltage_sel = regulator_get_voltage_sel_regmap,
> > +
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define PFUZE100_FIXED_REG(_name, base, voltage)	\
> > +{	\
> > +	[PFUZE100_ ## _name] = {	\
> > +		.desc = {	\
> > +			.name = #_name,	\
> > +			.n_voltages = 1,	\
> > +			.ops = &pfuze100_fixed_regulator_ops,	\
> > +			.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE,	\
> > +			.id = PFUZE100_ ## _name,	\
> > +			.owner = THIS_MODULE,	\
> > +			.min_uV = (voltage),	\
> > +			.enable_reg = (base),	\
> > +			.enable_mask = 0x10,	\
> > +		},	\
> > +	}	\
> > +}
> > +
> 
> With this and the following defines I had to remove the first and last
> curly braces. It didn't compile with them. I'm not that into the preprocessor,
> to fully understand if it is valid C syntax or not.
> Other drivers (e.g. mc13xxx) seem to also ommit these.
> 
Thanks your finding, I have noticed it after I send the V4 patch. I modify this
to eliminate the errors which found by checkpatch, such as"ERROR: Macros with
complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis". I notice some driver use
brace here, and modify this, sorry for sending quickly without building and
testing again.... I will keep it as V3 and before version on these macro define

> > +#define PFUZE100_SW_REG(_name, base, min, max, step)	\
> > +{	\
> > +	[PFUZE100_ ## _name] = {	\
> > +		.desc = {	\
> > +			.name = #_name,\
> > +			.n_voltages = ((max) - (min)) / (step) + 1,	\
> > +			.ops = &pfuze100_sw_regulator_ops,	\
> > +			.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE,	\
> > +			.id = PFUZE100_ ## _name,	\
> > +			.owner = THIS_MODULE,	\
> > +			.min_uV = (min),	\
> > +			.uV_step = (step),	\
> > +			.vsel_reg = (base) + PFUZE100_VOL_OFFSET,	\
> > +			.vsel_mask = 0x3f,	\
> > +		},	\
> > +		.stby_reg = (base) + PFUZE100_STANDBY_OFFSET,	\
> > +		.stby_mask = 0x3f,	\
> > +	}	\
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define PFUZE100_SWB_REG(_name, base, mask, voltages)	\
> > +{	\
> > +	[PFUZE100_ ## _name] = {	\
> > +		.desc = {	\
> > +			.name = #_name,	\
> > +			.n_voltages = ARRAY_SIZE(voltages),	\
> > +			.ops = &pfuze100_swb_regulator_ops,	\
> > +			.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE,	\
> > +			.id = PFUZE100_ ## _name,	\
> > +			.owner = THIS_MODULE,	\
> > +			.volt_table = voltages,	\
> > +			.vsel_reg = (base),	\
> > +			.vsel_mask = (mask),	\
> > +		},	\
> > +	}	\
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define PFUZE100_VGEN_REG(_name, base, min, max, step)	\
> > +{	\
> > +	[PFUZE100_ ## _name] = {	\
> > +		.desc = {	\
> > +			.name = #_name,	\
> > +			.n_voltages = ((max) - (min)) / (step) + 1,	\
> > +			.ops = &pfuze100_ldo_regulator_ops,	\
> > +			.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE,	\
> > +			.id = PFUZE100_ ## _name,	\
> > +			.owner = THIS_MODULE,	\
> > +			.min_uV = (min),	\
> > +			.uV_step = (step),	\
> > +			.vsel_reg = (base),	\
> > +			.vsel_mask = 0xf,	\
> > +			.enable_reg = (base),	\
> > +			.enable_mask = 0x10,	\
> > +		},	\
> > +		.stby_reg = (base),	\
> > +		.stby_mask = 0x20,	\
> > +	}	\
> > +}
> > +
> 
> Thanks,
> Steffen
> 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-24 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-21  9:17 [PATCH v4] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze100 regulator driver Robin Gong
2013-07-22  9:11 ` Shawn Guo
2013-07-22 10:39   ` Robin Gong
2013-07-22 12:46     ` Shawn Guo
2013-07-24  8:30 ` Steffen Trumtrar
2013-07-24  9:42   ` Mark Brown
2013-07-24  9:51     ` Steffen Trumtrar
2013-07-24 14:39       ` Mark Brown
2013-07-24 10:07   ` Robin Gong [this message]
2013-07-24 10:18     ` Steffen Trumtrar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130724100717.GA7786@Robin-OptiPlex-780 \
    --to=b38343@freescale.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).