From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:40096 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752283Ab3HCQKu (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Aug 2013 12:10:50 -0400 Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 17:10:29 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ASoc: kirkwood: simplify probe error Message-ID: <20130803161029.GD23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20130731081739.76aae84c@armhf> <20130803123954.GX23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130803175513.7b765b0d@armhf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130803175513.7b765b0d@armhf> Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jean-Francois Moine Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Rob Herring , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 05:55:13PM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > On Sat, 3 Aug 2013 13:39:54 +0100 > Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > This doesn't apply to mainline as there's a clk_put() there. > > Right, it applies to linux-next: > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:32:50 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > Always submit against where the code will be applied - -next in this > > case. Sorry, I'm just not going to bother with your patches unless you start posting them in such a way that interested parties can test them without having to run around and pull random trees. In other words, you should have Cc'd interested parties on that devm_* change patch - especially myself as I was the one who introduced that code.