From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/6] of: call __of_parse_phandle_with_args from of_parse_phandle
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:08:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130813090851.GG27165@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376328992-3115-4-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:36:30PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>
> The simplest case of __of_parse_phandle_with_args() implements
> of_parse_phandle(), except that it doesn't return the node referenced by
> the phandle. Modify it to do so, and then rewrite of_parse_phandle() to
> call __of_parse_phandle_with_args() rather than open-coding the simple
> case.
That commit message doesn't seem to match the patch (which doesn't
modify __of_parse_phandle_with_args).
Rather, now that __of_parse_phandle_with_args can handle parsing with a
fixed number of argument cells, it's possible to write of_parse_phandle
in terms of it.
What's the overhead over the old of_parse_phandle? It looks like this is
going to do a lot of pointless work beyond what it already does --
parsing each prior entry in the list, and for each prior entry walking
the tree in of_find_node_by_phandle. Maybe we don't use long enough
phandle lists anywhere for that to be noticeable.
Thanks,
Mark.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> ---
> v5: New patch.
> ---
> drivers/of/base.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 2f92522..79ed82c 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -1202,14 +1202,16 @@ static int __of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np,
> struct device_node *of_parse_phandle(const struct device_node *np,
> const char *phandle_name, int index)
> {
> - const __be32 *phandle;
> - int size;
> + struct of_phandle_args args;
>
> - phandle = of_get_property(np, phandle_name, &size);
> - if ((!phandle) || (size < sizeof(*phandle) * (index + 1)))
> + if (index < 0)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (__of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, phandle_name, NULL, 0,
> + index, &args))
> return NULL;
>
> - return of_find_node_by_phandle(be32_to_cpup(phandle + index));
> + return args.np;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_parse_phandle);
>
> --
> 1.8.1.5
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-13 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-12 17:36 [PATCH V5 1/6] of: move documentation of of_parse_phandle_with_args Stephen Warren
2013-08-12 17:36 ` [PATCH V5 2/6] of: move of_parse_phandle() Stephen Warren
2013-08-14 16:05 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-12 17:36 ` [PATCH V5 3/6] of: introduce of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args Stephen Warren
2013-08-12 17:36 ` [PATCH V5 4/6] of: call __of_parse_phandle_with_args from of_parse_phandle Stephen Warren
2013-08-13 9:08 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2013-08-13 15:54 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-13 16:29 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-13 18:12 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-14 16:04 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-12 17:36 ` [PATCH V5 5/6] gpio: clean up gpio-ranges documentation Stephen Warren
2013-08-12 17:36 ` [PATCH V5 6/6] gpio: implement gpio-ranges binding document fix Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130813090851.GG27165@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Pawel.Moll@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).