devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	cross-distro@lists.linaro.org,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Tom Rini <tom.rini@gmail.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Best practices for hardware shipping device trees
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:15:14 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819001514.GA9098@voom.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1308152241410.14472@syhkavp.arg>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1620 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:51:18PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, David Gibson wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:57:36PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On 08/14/2013 08:37 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Tom Rini wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > Well, the hard guideline should require that the DTB be updateable and 
> > > not linked with nor generated by the bootloader or firmware.  That 
> > > implies some storage separate from the bootloader but this doesn't need 
> > > to be a filesystem.
> > 
> > Wait, what!?
> > 
> > Much as I think a bunch of the current problems have been caused by
> > being overly keen to push the dtb into firmware, we shouldn't *ban*
> > the original Open Firmware model of the device tree, where it is
> > generated by the firmware and consumed by the OS.
> 
> If the DTB generating firmware can be updated by the end user just as 
> easily and safely as a standalone DTB then that's probably fine.  But we 
> do know that many people/organizations are not willing to let end users 
> upgrade bootloaders due to the risks associated with such an operation.  
> So in that case we may not suggest the DTB be tied to the 
> bootloader/firmware.

No, even then.  I really don't think trying to ban the actual,
original Open Firmware model of device tree usage is sensible.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-19  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-14 15:13 [RFC] Best practices for hardware shipping device trees Tom Rini
2013-08-14 16:38 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-14 18:41   ` Tom Rini
2013-08-14 18:53     ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-14 16:44 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-14 17:20   ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-14 18:25   ` Tom Rini
2013-08-15  0:37     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-15  2:09       ` Tom Rini
2013-08-15  2:57         ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-15 14:53           ` Tom Rini
2013-08-15 15:30             ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-15 16:37               ` Tom Rini
2013-08-15 17:31                 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-15 18:56                   ` Tom Rini
2013-08-15 22:34                     ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-15 15:45             ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-15 17:00               ` Tom Rini
2013-08-15 23:59           ` David Gibson
2013-08-16  2:51             ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-19  0:15               ` David Gibson [this message]
2013-08-19 18:43                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-20  6:40                   ` Alexander Graf
2013-08-20 12:02                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-20 17:02                       ` Matt Sealey
2013-08-20 17:29                         ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-20 15:03                     ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130819001514.GA9098@voom.fritz.box \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cross-distro@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=tom.rini@gmail.com \
    --cc=trini@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).