devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <b42378@freescale.com>,
	"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "lars@metafoo.de" <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"p.zabel@pengutronix.de" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"timur@tabi.org" <timur@tabi.org>,
	"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"shawn.guo@linaro.org" <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"tomasz.figa@gmail.com" <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	"swarren@wwwdotorg.org" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	"R65777@freescale.com" <R65777@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] ASoC: fsl: Add S/PDIF machine driver
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:01:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819100143.GH3719@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130819095042.GA11402@MrMyself>

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:50:43AM +0100, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:24:58AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Is this used semantically, or is it a completely arbitrary string?  In
> > either case I don't see why the compatible string doesn't give the
> > driver enough to have a sensible value.
> > 
> > I'm confused as to why we need this. The phrase "user-visible" in a
> > device description seems very odd.
> 
> The string would be in the ALSA device list:
> ALSA device list:
>   #0: imx-spdif
> 
> I think it can be a sort of arbitrary as long as users know which this 
> device exactly is when they catch the name by 'aplay -l' or 'arecord -l'
> 
> The phrase "user-visible" is being used in many current docs, I don't 
> dare to change it unless a sage gives me a suggestion.

I can see that there is entrenched usage, but this really seems to be
embedding Linux-specific implementation details into the dt. I don't see
why the driver cannot select a sensible name, but perhaps I'm missing
something.

Mark, is there any reason we need to handle the user-visible name of the
device this way?

> 
> > > +
> > > +  - spdif-controller : The phandle of the i.MX S/PDIF controller
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +Optional properties:
> > > +
> > > +  - spdif-transmitter : The phandle of the spdif-transmitter dummy codec
> > > +
> > > +  - spdif-receiver : The phandle of the spdif-receiver dummy codec
> > > +
> > > +* Note: At least one of these two properties should be set in the DT binding.
> > 
> > Are all four units (comlpex,controller,transmitter,receiver) really
> > separate blocks?
> 
> At least they are separate drivers as I mentioned in the commit comments.

I'm not sure that the boundary of Linux drivers should necessarily
determine the way we carve up the description of IP blocks, though
presumably it's a pretty sensible way of carving it up or we wouldn't
have done it.

Is there any public documentation on the i.MX S/PDIF hardware block(s)?

Thanks,
Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-19 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-19  8:35 [PATCH v7 0/2] Add freescale S/PDIF CPU DAI and machine drivers Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19  8:35 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] ASoC: fsl: Add S/PDIF CPU DAI driver Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19  9:18   ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19  9:34     ` Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19  9:54       ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 10:13         ` Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19 11:13           ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 11:34             ` Nicolin Chen
2013-08-20  8:47               ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-20  5:19         ` Shawn Guo
2013-08-20  8:54           ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-20 16:28           ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-19  8:35 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] ASoC: fsl: Add S/PDIF machine driver Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19  9:24   ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19  9:50     ` Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19 10:01       ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2013-08-19 10:21         ` Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19 11:15           ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 10:27         ` Philipp Zabel
2013-08-19 10:52         ` Mark Brown
2013-08-19 11:31           ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 11:45             ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130819100143.GH3719@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=R65777@freescale.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=b42378@freescale.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=timur@tabi.org \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).