From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <b42378@freescale.com>,
"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "lars@metafoo.de" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"p.zabel@pengutronix.de" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"timur@tabi.org" <timur@tabi.org>,
"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
"shawn.guo@linaro.org" <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"tomasz.figa@gmail.com" <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
"swarren@wwwdotorg.org" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
"R65777@freescale.com" <R65777@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] ASoC: fsl: Add S/PDIF machine driver
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:01:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819100143.GH3719@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130819095042.GA11402@MrMyself>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:50:43AM +0100, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:24:58AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Is this used semantically, or is it a completely arbitrary string? In
> > either case I don't see why the compatible string doesn't give the
> > driver enough to have a sensible value.
> >
> > I'm confused as to why we need this. The phrase "user-visible" in a
> > device description seems very odd.
>
> The string would be in the ALSA device list:
> ALSA device list:
> #0: imx-spdif
>
> I think it can be a sort of arbitrary as long as users know which this
> device exactly is when they catch the name by 'aplay -l' or 'arecord -l'
>
> The phrase "user-visible" is being used in many current docs, I don't
> dare to change it unless a sage gives me a suggestion.
I can see that there is entrenched usage, but this really seems to be
embedding Linux-specific implementation details into the dt. I don't see
why the driver cannot select a sensible name, but perhaps I'm missing
something.
Mark, is there any reason we need to handle the user-visible name of the
device this way?
>
> > > +
> > > + - spdif-controller : The phandle of the i.MX S/PDIF controller
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +Optional properties:
> > > +
> > > + - spdif-transmitter : The phandle of the spdif-transmitter dummy codec
> > > +
> > > + - spdif-receiver : The phandle of the spdif-receiver dummy codec
> > > +
> > > +* Note: At least one of these two properties should be set in the DT binding.
> >
> > Are all four units (comlpex,controller,transmitter,receiver) really
> > separate blocks?
>
> At least they are separate drivers as I mentioned in the commit comments.
I'm not sure that the boundary of Linux drivers should necessarily
determine the way we carve up the description of IP blocks, though
presumably it's a pretty sensible way of carving it up or we wouldn't
have done it.
Is there any public documentation on the i.MX S/PDIF hardware block(s)?
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-19 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-19 8:35 [PATCH v7 0/2] Add freescale S/PDIF CPU DAI and machine drivers Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19 8:35 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] ASoC: fsl: Add S/PDIF CPU DAI driver Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19 9:18 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 9:34 ` Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19 9:54 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 10:13 ` Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19 11:13 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 11:34 ` Nicolin Chen
2013-08-20 8:47 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-20 5:19 ` Shawn Guo
2013-08-20 8:54 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-20 16:28 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-19 8:35 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] ASoC: fsl: Add S/PDIF machine driver Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19 9:24 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 9:50 ` Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19 10:01 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2013-08-19 10:21 ` Nicolin Chen
2013-08-19 11:15 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 10:27 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-08-19 10:52 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-19 11:31 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 11:45 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130819100143.GH3719@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=R65777@freescale.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=b42378@freescale.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=timur@tabi.org \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).