From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] clk: dt: bindings for mux, divider & gate clocks Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:32:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20130823043248.GF23960@codeaurora.org> References: <1371795256-16703-1-git-send-email-mturquette@linaro.org> <51E8586C.7040808@codeaurora.org> <20130822041448.8231.16182@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130822041448.8231.16182@quantum> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Turquette Cc: Grant Likely , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heiko St??bner , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Tero Kristo , Haojian Zhuang , Matt Sealey , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/21, Mike Turquette wrote: > > I just happened across a to-do list note telling me to respond to this > email. Better late than never. > [snip] > > This is a way to establish initial configuration from the consumer's > perspective. Similarly something can be done for the clock rate with > assigned-clock-rate. Ok. Thanks for the information. Unfortunately it isn't what I thought it was. > > With all of that said this is consumer-level stuff. We'll definitely > talk about the clock provider DT bindings at the ARM Summit, which is > what you discuss above. I can't wait another 2 months to start discussing the clock provider DT bindings. We need to discuss it on the list. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation