From: Lars Poeschel <larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: mcp23s08: rename the device tree property
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:06:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201308251206.41764.larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZMsBynLohhNw=XyzpYns9E8QVksVJYkv3dcRJ2JHWLnA@mail.gmail.com>
Am Freitag 23 August 2013, 21:10:00 schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Lars Poeschel <larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de>
wrote:
> > From: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>
> >
> > The device tree property should be more descriptive.
> > microchip seems more reasonable than mcp. As there are no
> > in tree users of this property, so the rename can still be
> > done without pain.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>
>
> So do I apply this to the GPIO tree now or what?
>
> Are the DT custodians happy?
No Linus, do not take this.
There will be a new version.
Thanks,
Lars
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-25 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-22 9:56 [PATCH 1/2] gpio: mcp23s08: rename the device tree property Lars Poeschel
2013-08-22 9:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] of: add vendor prefix for Microchip Technology Inc Lars Poeschel
2013-08-23 14:20 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-23 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: mcp23s08: rename the device tree property Mark Rutland
2013-08-23 15:22 ` Lars Poeschel
2013-08-23 16:48 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-23 19:10 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-25 10:06 ` Lars Poeschel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201308251206.41764.larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de \
--to=larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=poeschel@lemonage.de \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).