From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Poeschel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: mcp23s08: rename the device tree property Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:06:41 +0200 Message-ID: <201308251206.41764.larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de> References: <1377165378-9589-1-git-send-email-larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Lars Poeschel , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Rob Landley , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag 23 August 2013, 21:10:00 schrieb Linus Walleij: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Lars Poeschel wrote: > > From: Lars Poeschel > > > > The device tree property should be more descriptive. > > microchip seems more reasonable than mcp. As there are no > > in tree users of this property, so the rename can still be > > done without pain. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel > > So do I apply this to the GPIO tree now or what? > > Are the DT custodians happy? No Linus, do not take this. There will be a new version. Thanks, Lars