devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/5] ARM: Initial support for Marvell Armada 1500
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:19:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130827161958.5e71890d@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376682098-10580-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>

Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth,

On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 21:41:33 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> This is a RFC adding initial support for the Marvell Armada 1500
> (88DE3100) found on various consumer devices (Chromecast, GoogleTV).
> 
> Actually, it is a two-fold RFC also raising discussions on mach-mvebu
> cleanup roadmap to allow other SoCs to hop into it. While mach-mvebu
> originally was created to add support for Armada 370/XP and merge
> existing Marvell Orion familiy into it, I am not so sure about
> Armada 1500 fits that well (the mbus has gone!).

After talking a bit with engineers within Marvell that work on this
SoC, I'm inclined to think that using mach-mvebu for this family of SoC
is not a good idea.

The reasons are:

 * This family of SoC is architecturally completely different from the
   family of Orion SoC: they use completely different hardware blocks
   (i.e none of the plat-orion stuff would apply, and none of the
   Orion device drivers would be useful), they don't use the MBus
   mechanism, etc. They are really a different family of SoC, almost as
   if they were coming from a different SoC company.

 * The SMP and power management code, as well as all the "glue"
   platform code that typically sits in mach-<foo> is going to be
   substantially, if not completely different from the one in
   mach-mvebu. I already believe doing all the "glue" platform code in
   mach-mvebu for all of Kirkwood, Dove, 370/XP, Orion5x and MV78xx0 is
   going to be a challenge, so I'd suggest to not add to this challenge
   a completely separate family of SOCs.

The codename used for those Armada 1500 SOCs is "Berlin", so a name
like mach-berlin, or mach-mvberlin (if we want to keep 'mv' to identify
the founder) seems like a good name.

Also, to help us understand the organization of the family of SOCs, I
asked a few informations to Marvell, and here is what I could collect:

"""
BGxname		CPU core	codename	L2 cache controller	internal name
BG2		PJ4B		Armada1500	Tauros3			MV88DE3100
BG2-CT		Cortex-A9	N/A		PL310			N/A
BG3		Cortex-A15	N/A		CA15 integrated		N/A
"""

As was told that the Armada X or MV88DEx names are not used during
development, and what Marvell is really using are the BGxx names.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

       reply	other threads:[~2013-08-27 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1376682098-10580-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
2013-08-27 14:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-08-27 16:45   ` [RFC v1 0/5] ARM: Initial support for Marvell Armada 1500 Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-27 16:51     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-27 19:38   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-08-28  0:14 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/6] irqchip: add DesignWare APB ICTL interrupt controller Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-28  0:14 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/6] ARM: add Armada 1500 and Sony NSZ-GS7 device tree files Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-28 12:14   ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-28 12:23     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130827161958.5e71890d@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).