From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@freescale.com>
Cc: r65073@freescale.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
grant.likely@linaro.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rob@landley.net,
ian.campbell@citrix.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, pawel.moll@arm.com,
rob.herring@calxeda.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Jingchang Lu <b35083@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 19:49:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130830174909.GF30088@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377856132-11290-2-git-send-email-Li.Xiubo@freescale.com>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 05:48:49PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> +
> +#define FTM_CSC_BASE 0x0C
> +#define FTM_CSC(_channel) \
> + (FTM_CSC_BASE + ((_channel) * 8))
Put into a single line.
> +#define FTMCnSC_MSB BIT(5)
> +#define FTMCnSC_MSA BIT(4)
> +#define FTMCnSC_ELSB BIT(3)
> +#define FTMCnSC_ELSA BIT(2)
> +
> +#define FTM_CV_BASE 0x10
> +#define FTM_CV(_channel) \
> + (FTM_CV_BASE + ((_channel) * 8))
ditto.
> +static int fsl_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc;
> + struct fsl_pwm_data *pwm_data;
> +
> + fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
> +
> + pwm_data = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
> + if (!pwm_data)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (pwm_data->available != FSL_AVAILABLE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = clk_enable(fpc->sys_clk);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
This is non atomic context. You can also prepare the clocks here instead
of doing it in probe().
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void fsl_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> + struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc;
> + struct fsl_pwm_data *pwm_data;
> +
> + fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
> +
> + pwm_data = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
> + if (!pwm_data)
> + return;
THis check seems unnecessary.
> +
> + if (pwm_data->available != FSL_AVAILABLE)
> + return;
> +
> + clk_disable(fpc->sys_clk);
> +}
> +
[...]
> +
> +
> + pwm_data->period_cycles = period_cycles;
> + pwm_data->duty_cycles = duty_cycles;
These fields are set but never read. Please drop them.
If you drop the 'available' field also the you can drop chip_data
completely.
> +
> + writel(FTMCnSC_MSB | FTMCnSC_ELSB, fpc->base + FTM_CSC(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + writel(0xF0, fpc->base + FTM_OUTMASK);
> + writel(0x0F, fpc->base + FTM_OUTINIT);
> + writel(FTM_CNTIN_VAL, fpc->base + FTM_CNTIN);
> +
> + writel(period_cycles + cntin - 1, fpc->base + FTM_MOD);
> + writel(duty_cycles + cntin, fpc->base + FTM_CV(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int fsl_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + enum pwm_polarity polarity)
> +{
> + unsigned long reg;
> + struct fsl_pwm_data *pwm_data;
> + struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc;
> +
> + fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
> +
> + pwm_data = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
> + if (!pwm_data)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (pwm_data->available != FSL_AVAILABLE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + reg = readl(fpc->base + FTM_POL);
> + reg &= ~BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
Either drop this line...
> + if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> + reg |= BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
> + else
> + reg &= ~BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
...or this one
> +static int fsl_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc;
> + struct pinctrl_state *pins_state;
> + struct fsl_pwm_data *pwm_data;
> + const char *statename;
> +
> + fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
> +
> + pwm_data = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
> + if (!pwm_data)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (pwm_data->available != FSL_AVAILABLE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + statename = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "ch%d-active", pwm->hwpwm);
You loose memory here and in fsl_pwm_disable aswell.
> + pins_state = pinctrl_lookup_state(fpc->pinctrl,
> + statename);
> + /* enable pins to be muxed in and configured */
> + if (!IS_ERR(pins_state)) {
> + ret = pinctrl_select_state(fpc->pinctrl, pins_state);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(chip->dev, "could not set default pins\n");
> + } else
> + dev_warn(chip->dev, "could not get default pinstate\n");
Either it's ok to do without pinctrl or it's not ok, so either return
an error or drop the warnings. Polluting the kernel log with such
messages from a frequently called function is not a good idea.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-30 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-30 9:48 [PATCHv2 0/4] Add Freescale FTM PWM driver for Vybrid VF610 TOWER Xiubo Li
2013-08-30 9:48 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support Xiubo Li
2013-08-30 17:49 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2013-09-02 3:33 ` Xiubo Li-B47053
2013-09-02 8:56 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-09-03 4:17 ` Xiubo Li-B47053
2013-09-03 6:58 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-09-03 7:40 ` Xiubo Li-B47053
2013-08-30 9:48 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] ARM: dts: Add Freescale FTM PWM node for VF610 Xiubo Li
2013-08-30 9:48 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] ARM: dts: Enables FTM PWM device for Vybrid VF610 TOWER board Xiubo Li
2013-08-30 9:48 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] Documentation: Add device tree bindings for Freescale FTM PWM Xiubo Li
2013-08-30 17:30 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-09-02 2:38 ` Xiubo Li-B47053
2013-09-02 8:52 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130830174909.GF30088@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=Li.Xiubo@freescale.com \
--cc=b35083@freescale.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=r65073@freescale.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).