From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Reichel Subject: Re: [RFCv2 3/3] ARM: dts: N900: Add SSI information Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 21:27:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20130916192722.GB21903@earth.universe> References: <1379277856-24571-1-git-send-email-sre@debian.org> <1379277856-24571-4-git-send-email-sre@debian.org> <20130916150147.GA14047@earth.universe> <20130916181032.GB30568@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130916181032.GB30568-R3WNPi76c83LsdW6vOPryG4HOFkwEHDbMR2xtNvyitY@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Aaro Koskinen Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas , Linus Walleij , Shubhrajyoti Datta , Carlos Chinea , Paul Walmsley , Kevin Hilman , Tony Lindgren , Russell King , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Rob Landley , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Cousson , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linux Kernel , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , "linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 09:10:32PM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:01:47PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > > Is the Synchronous Serial Interface (SSI) only supported by > > > OMAP34xx/OMAP35xx SoC and not by OMAP36xx/OMAP37xx SoC? > > >=20 > > > I'm asking this since if SSI is supported by both we should add the > > > device nodes in omap3.dtsi instead of omap34xx.dtsi. > > >=20 > > > I thought that all OMAP3 SoC supported SSI and all OMAP4 SoC supported > > > HSI but I guess I was wrong... > >=20 > > I just do not know. Information about the SSI core is not included > > in the public OMAP TRM. It only lists the memory space as reserved. > >=20 > > Thus I only included it in OMAP34xx, which is used in Nokia N900 and > > must support SSI. >=20 > I think N9 and N950 (OMAP3630) are using pretty much the same driver. OK. I've checked the N950 kernel from [0] and it uses the same data. I will move the data from omap34xx.dtsi to omap3.dtsi in the next RFC. Thanks for the hint. [0] https://github.com/nemomobile/kernel-adaptation-n950-n9/ -- Sebastian --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSN1uZAAoJENju1/PIO/qaYZMQAKag/PnkRZD1Z5sL72wzwlow nLzrbXSaY09Re18fgC32YHESnhwtoxUrWKNZIk1qQf8ppzeAbdjCBifsTTWB4X4q RrlZ1u6UfwO8cfqTtHKNrz2uA2MVWQpcLqb7j9zw/OLqDIDwhlZ/DEA7zF3fQgWA GdJxtjkLXAvoB5meTumn1iBuqe2NQGWolrUi8YL0zrabt1mrfhXQKHDaPv54WsHO G2UMURtQRXsjI5+kumX342TBbup4gGG8+ohZ/H8tOIbm6FWQa6jBp3PYn4UlybbX PUxxnqEkAKB44Pf4o4i2dPNg4Ehe0KdcIKXR8DYZbg46Nl+wQa/wtgqJ9/U4413Z 6wViT4Xdtv3lxq4p/OrMUhU8uZWr2UTaZ6w5i6grWFRKhsPqVfXm1hnll3z8OBwo cDyYG2h/KP7IROYCMShP2FNEb43AdSxW84pv1c0G35LEyE5ehBVNujMzbM2bgL2R 67swmCBvSAxaumtkY5vJ8+cMR4mt47iWMCfe5sN9hp6uCXZICk1u9kb5KRgkNgSe QdbXfvNwNKlQOmwAhIawLxolnaji1w+7V3abPf7qZuP2GnJsCsuhdTvhUYwShQkA LCZ99aAbmtyfM9z9a7RmSmsjUHLwdGZsT0Kq5AX7ON3KUajhX+7kEnVPy7VMmKIZ Efuk9Z4VkqZ+nfAeHMGh =KlmL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html