From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Lior Amsalem <alior-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Christian Gmeiner
<christian.gmeiner-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel.garcia-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Gregory Clement
<gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Florian Fainelli
<florian-p3rKhJxN3npAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2 3/4] of: provide a binding for fixed link PHYs
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 18:11:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130918181112.56c10dde@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130918042923.5D845C42CF7-WNowdnHR2B42iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
Dear Grant Likely,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:29:23 -0500, Grant Likely wrote:
> I understand what you're trying to do here, but it causes a troublesome
> leakage of implementation detail into the binding, making the whole
> thing look very odd. This binding tries to make a fixed link look
> exactly like a real PHY even to the point of including a phandle to the
> phy. But having a phandle to a node which is *always* a direct child of
> the MAC node is redundant and a rather looney. Yes, doing it that way
> makes it easy for of_phy_find_device() to be transparent for fixed link,
> but that should *not* drive bindings, especially when that makes the
> binding really rather weird.
>
> Second, this new binding doesn't provide anything over and above the
> existing fixed-link binding. It may not be pretty, but it is
> estabilshed.
Have you followed the past discussions about this patch set? Basically
the *only* feedback I received on RFCv1 is that the fixed-link property
sucks, and everybody (including the known Device Tree binding
maintainer Mark Rutland) suggested to not use the fixed-link mechanism.
See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/276932, where Mark
said:
""
I'm not sure grouping these values together is the best way of handling
this. It's rather opaque, and inflexible for future extension.
""
So, please DT maintainers, tell me what you want. I honestly don't care
whether fixed-link or a separate node is chosen. However, I do care
about being dragged around between two solutions just because the
former DT maintainer and the new DT maintainers do not agree.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-18 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-06 15:18 [RFC PATCHv2 0/4] Add DT support for fixed PHYs Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-06 15:18 ` [RFC PATCHv2 1/4] net: phy: decouple PHY id and PHY address in fixed PHY driver Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-06 15:18 ` [RFC PATCHv2 2/4] net: phy: extend fixed driver with fixed_phy_register() Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-06 15:18 ` [RFC PATCHv2 3/4] of: provide a binding for fixed link PHYs Thomas Petazzoni
[not found] ` <1378480701-12908-4-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-18 4:29 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20130918042923.5D845C42CF7-WNowdnHR2B42iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-18 9:21 ` Florian Fainelli
[not found] ` <CAGVrzcbVTenhVC4tQznJFqVpO08ruxLyy1ZiLmw6Bu1=3zbGZg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-18 15:00 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20130918150031.D9034C42CDF-WNowdnHR2B42iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-19 6:36 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-09-18 16:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-10-25 4:40 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-11-12 12:37 ` Grant Likely
2013-11-12 16:29 ` Mark Rutland
2013-11-12 17:40 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-11-12 1:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-09-06 15:18 ` [RFC PATCHv2 4/4] net: mvneta: add support for fixed links Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-06 20:42 ` [RFC PATCHv2 0/4] Add DT support for fixed PHYs Florian Fainelli
2013-09-07 10:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-11 6:42 ` Sascha Hauer
[not found] ` <20130911064248.GI30088-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-25 7:12 ` Christian Gmeiner
[not found] ` <CAH9NwWfBGHmZ+HfUndeh18NW+HyZ=c82W=O_4hJSOH-oZuM9jA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-10 10:30 ` Christian Gmeiner
2014-02-10 12:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130918181112.56c10dde@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55scjutkeb57/3fjtnbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=alior-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=christian.gmeiner-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=florian-p3rKhJxN3npAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).