From: Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan
<ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org,
rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org,
ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org,
rob-VoJi6FS/r0vR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: core: introduce of_node_name for mfd sub devices
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 13:00:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130919120051.GG22389@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130919115501.GM21013-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 09:30:50AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > I'm not entirely sure this is what Mark was saying. I think he was
> > complaining about the existence of the sub-nodes rather than how the
> > MFD Core assigns their of_node. My take is that the chip is really a
> > single device which provides different bits of functionality. To break
> > that functionality up and disperse the drivers into various subsystems
> > is a Linuxisum. By providing each functional block with its own node
> > you're describing how we do things in Linux, rather than specifying a
> > single node for the AS3722 which would probably be the norm.
>
> Yes, that's exactly what I was thinking of.
>
> > Do the sub-nodes have their own properties? If so, it would be worth
> > breaking them up as other OSes could reuse the specifics. If they do,
> > then you need so put them in the binding. If they don't, then you do
> > not require sub-nodes. The MFD core will ensure the sub-devices are
> > probed and there is no requirement for the of_node to be assigned.
>
> You do see some reusable IP blocks (like the regualtors on the wm831x
> PMICs for example, they're repeated blocks) which can be reused but
> generally they have a register base as part of the binding. Personally
> if it's just a property or two I'd probably just put them on the root
> node for the device.
Agreed. Besides, there doesn't seem to be *any* sub-device properties
defined in the binding document. So what are you trying to achieve
with the child nodes?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-19 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-19 8:29 [PATCH] mfd: core: introduce of_node_name for mfd sub devices Laxman Dewangan
2013-09-19 8:30 ` Lee Jones
2013-09-19 8:57 ` Laxman Dewangan
2013-09-19 11:55 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20130919115501.GM21013-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-19 12:00 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2013-09-19 12:28 ` Laxman Dewangan
[not found] ` <523AEE07.9090405-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-19 12:22 ` Lee Jones
2013-09-19 12:54 ` Laxman Dewangan
2013-09-23 20:46 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-24 13:55 ` Lee Jones
[not found] ` <1379579392-1794-1-git-send-email-ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-23 20:50 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130919120051.GG22389@lee--X1 \
--to=lee.jones-qsej5fyqhm4dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rob-VoJi6FS/r0vR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).