From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: takashi.yoshii.zj@renesas.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: shmobile: emev2: Define SMU clock DT bindings Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:00:59 +0900 Message-ID: <20130924180059.40485f1c9b841b04c3bb5f04@renesas.com> References: <52410F86.4040301@renesas.com> <20130924131331.0e9a5f830f531655b2ea0ebe@ops.dti.ne.jp> <20130924045215.GE3619@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130924045215.GE3619@verge.net.au> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Simon Horman Cc: SH-Linux , Magnus Damm , ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk, Shinya Kuribayashi , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mundt , Mike Turquette , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Simon, # I had added wrong From:, sorry. > With this in mind I believe the strings should be: > > - renesas,smu-emev2 > - renesas,smu-clkdiv-emev2 > - renesas,smu-gclk-emev2 Thank you for pointed it out. I'll fix it in v2. > To be honest I am not quite sure about the "-clkdiv" and "-gclk" Neither am I. I'm afread there are many 'not sure' thing for me about DT. I know some part might be wrong, which does not follow ePAPR at least. But, even I don't know whether I should follow ePAPR or not. I will wait for response for a while. /yoshii