From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add Core Divider clock support for Armada 370/XP Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:12:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20130926181206.70ef355b@skate> References: <1380144502-24109-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> <20130925213730.GA19371@localhost> <5243E46B.2000406@free-electrons.com> <20130926152651.GC4583@localhost> <20130926174755.15a65f92@skate> <20130926160010.GD4583@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130926160010.GD4583@localhost> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ezequiel Garcia Cc: Gregory CLEMENT , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Lior Amsalem , Mike Turquette , Tawfik Bayouk , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Emilio Lopez List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Dear Ezequiel Garcia, On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:00:11 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Hm... could be. Considering the lack of hardware details (as you > point out) maybe this is indeed the best option. > > And it has the cool advantage of simplfying the clock tree, which > is unnecessarily complex with the NAND ECC clock -> NAND clock layout. > > On the other side, Emilio has just pointed out (in private) that > there's a flag "CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT" that is meant for these cases. > > Anyway, I feel inclined to your suggestion and just forget about the > NAND ECC clock for good, which is only confusing. Yes, I also believe it's the easiest solution. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html