From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Turquette Subject: Re: RE: RE: [PATCH v2 00/12] clk/exynos convert clock IDs to macros Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 13:27:09 -0700 Message-ID: <20131006202709.32214.75572@quantum> References: <1378462361-13680-1-git-send-email-a.hajda@samsung.com> <8412301.YP2zzplWoe@amdc1227> <070001ceafa5$d4d81a40$7e884ec0$%kim@samsung.com> <523716C9.3000204@samsung.com> <20130916193709.27384.86101@quantum> <06c101cebdc5$75a83d10$60f8b730$%kim@samsung.com> <20131002010953.9338.23436@quantum> <0d8901cec170$f7230b50$e56921f0$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <0d8901cec170$f7230b50$e56921f0$%kim@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim , 'Sylwester Nawrocki' Cc: 'Tomasz Figa' , 'Andrzej Hajda' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Kyungmin Park' , 'devicetree' , 'linux-samsung-soc' List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-10-04 19:16:56) > Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-09-30 03:11:41) > > > Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > > > > > Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2013-09-16 07:33:45) > > > > > On 09/12/2013 12:50 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > > > Well...I'm not sure changing to use macro is better or not at this > > > > moment... > > > > > > > > > > I think it is. ;) It's really less error prone to have symbolic > > names > > > > instead > > > > > of the plain numbers. The clock ids are defined in one place and it > > is > > > > more > > > > > clear what a clock is by looking at symbolic name. It's especially > > > > annoying > > > > > to use plain numbers where are are many clock in a single node, like > > 10 > > > > or > > > > > more. What are you main concerns with this ? > > > > > > > > I think having the symbolic names is a win for readability. > > > > > > > Hmm...since Mike who is a maintainer for ccf agrees with Sylwester's > > opinion, so I agree. Actually, I had no strong objection on this but still > > I'm not sure using macro is really better because sometimes the name > > doesn't give readability really I think though. > > > > > > Mike, can you give me your ack on clk stuff? > > > > Yes, but I was thinking to take this change through the clk tree. The > > new branch based on -rc3 will be published tonight. > > > > Let me know if it causes problems for you for me to take it. > > > Uhm, I think dt changes can make ugly conflicts because of spread dt changing? Sure, go ahead and take the patches then. Acked-by: Mike Turquette Regards, Mike > > - Kukjin