devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>,
	"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] PM / OPP: extend DT binding to specify phandle of another node for OPP
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:40:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131018084041.GC398@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqKPprCKorvfgCH3usvX6hw5moypQYvKTdAznFVoTV-pyg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 02:22:44PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:

[...]

> >>> +    cpu3: cpu@101 {
> >>> +            compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
> >>> +            reg = <101>;
> >>> +            operating-points-phandle = <&cluster1_opp>;
> >>> +    };
> >>> +
> >>> +    opps-table {
> >>> +            cluster0_opp: cluster0_opp {
> >>
> >> Why not use the cpu topology? Then the operating point can apply to
> >> cores based on the position in the topology. You don't even need a
> >> phandle in that case. You can look for OPPs in either a cpu node or in
> >> the topology.
> >>
> > Agreed but few thoughts behind this binding:
> >
> > 1. OPPs are not just cpu specific:
> >    How do we share OPPs for 2 devices in the same clock domain ?
> >    Also moving the OPP into cpu-topo makes parsing specific to cpu.
> >    Currently the OPP library fetches the of_node from the device struct
> >    which is applicable to any devices.
> 
> But an OPP for a cpu is cpu specific, so put it there. For devices, we
> may need something different. Perhaps it should be part of the clock
> binding in some way.
> 
> > 2. Should cpu topology(i.e. cpu-map) just contain the topology info ? and
> >    phandles to these nodes should be used to setup any affinity ?
> 
> Can't the OPP just be in the topology nodes at the appropriate level.
> Then the kernel can look for the OPPs in either place. Perhaps Lorenzo
> has thoughts on this.

The reason we introduced the topology nodes (ie cpu-map) was to provide
a topology description of the system with leaf nodes linked to cpu
nodes; nodes in the topology do not map to HW entities.
Put it differently, IMHO we should attach no HW meaning to nodes in the
cpu-map so we should not add eg OPPs under cluster nodes because those
nodes do not represent HW entities, I would like to keep cpu-map a pure
DT representation of the topology, no more, but debate is open.

Lorenzo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-18  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-01 13:32 [PATCH v2 0/5] PM / OPP: updates to enable sharing OPPs info Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
     [not found] ` <1380634382-15609-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-01 13:32   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] PM / OPP: extend DT binding to specify phandle of another node for OPP Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-10-03 12:40     ` Nishanth Menon
     [not found]       ` <524D65A3.5090906-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-03 13:05         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-10-03 14:29           ` Nishanth Menon
2013-10-07 12:40     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-10-07 16:01     ` Rob Herring
2013-10-08 12:55       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-10-17 11:15         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-10-17 13:22         ` Rob Herring
2013-10-17 17:22           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-10-17 18:36             ` Nishanth Menon
2013-10-18  8:40           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2013-10-01 13:33   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] PM / OPP: check for existing OPP list when initialising from device tree Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-10-03  4:54     ` Viresh Kumar
     [not found]     ` <1380634382-15609-4-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-03 14:25       ` Nishanth Menon
2013-10-01 13:33   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] cpufreq: arm_big_little_dt: enhance OPP error checking Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-10-03  4:55     ` Viresh Kumar
     [not found]     ` <1380634382-15609-5-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-03 14:26       ` Nishanth Menon
2013-10-01 13:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] PM / OPP: add support to specify phandle of another node for OPP Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
     [not found]   ` <1380634382-15609-3-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-01 16:46     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
     [not found]       ` <524AFC52.8080201-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-03 14:20         ` Nishanth Menon
2013-10-03 15:39           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-10-01 13:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] cpufreq: arm_big_little_dt: return success if OPP list already exists Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
     [not found]   ` <1380634382-15609-6-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-03  4:54     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-10-16 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] PM / OPP: updates to enable sharing OPPs info Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-17 17:26   ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131018084041.GC398@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Pawel.Moll@arm.com \
    --cc=Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).