From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: kirkwood: add S/PDIF support Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:30:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20131018103019.GW25034@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20130924124122.64834b2a@armhf> <20131018003439.GG2443@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131018003439.GG2443-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Jean-Francois Moine , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org, Takashi Iwai , Liam Girdwood , Rob Herring , Jaroslav Kysela , Grant Likely , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:34:39AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > The last set of DPCMish patches was reported to work so should be a > fairly small refactoring away from being OK - the main thing is to > create back end DAIs for the physical links and then put the widgets > that manage the enable of the S/PDIF and I2S interfaces between the FE > and BE DAIs instead of directly connecting them to widgets on the CODEC. ROTFL. You're now telling JF to do exactly what I did in my last patch. Your two-faced-ness is utterly astounding. "widgets that manage the enable of the S/PDIF and I2S interfaces between the FE and BE DAIs" is exactly what I did and you told me that was wrong. Make up your fscking mind. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html