From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better? Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:47:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20131023174736.GD5208@netboy> References: <20131020220839.GT2443@sirena.org.uk> <5264576F.6050307@wwwdotorg.org> <52658EBC.8020800@wwwdotorg.org> <20131022093923.GC15640@ulmo.nvidia.com> <20131022150426.GF29341@beef> <20131022171346.GE4061@obsidianresearch.com> <20131023080630.GA14413@netboy> <20131023172955.GA17145@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131023172955.GA17145-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "ksummit-2013-discuss-cunTk1MwBs98uUxBSJOaYoYkZiVZrdSR2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org" , Nicolas Pitre , Stephen Warren , Mark Brown , Thierry Reding , Matt Porter , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:29:55AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > I've seen that nebulous answer before. It is awfully vauge. Don't you > think a better, more excting answer is required to commit the kernel > community to such a huge amount of work+pain? > > What users? What use cases? Who exactly? Gimme a break. The use case I mentioned is not at all vague. It is about a specific a use case as you'll ever see. > Crucially: Does the above justify the huge effort on the kernel side? The effort is no more or less than is required of every other kernel development. Thanks, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html