From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better? Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:38:34 +0200 Message-ID: <20131024143832.GA9044@ulmo.nvidia.com> References: <20131024095232.27BBCC4039D@trevor.secretlab.ca> <1382614439.6040.16.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <1382615278.8522.72.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20131024122346.GD11296@ulmo.nvidia.com> <1382619655.6040.52.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <516bfc7f9366ff3ef9187c36dd160888.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org> <1382621431.6040.66.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <20131024141955.GB25061@ulmo.nvidia.com> <465e75de15f7d79c3b57a3b88024e739.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <465e75de15f7d79c3b57a3b88024e739.squirrel-fWAbwA/6YHlc2C7mugBRk2EX/6BAtgUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: David Woodhouse Cc: mbizon-MmRyKUhfbQ9GWvitb5QawA@public.gmane.org, Grant Likely , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "ksummit-2013-discuss-cunTk1MwBs98uUxBSJOaYoYkZiVZrdSR2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org" , Nicolas Pitre , Jason Gunthorpe , Matt Porter , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:30:09PM -0000, David Woodhouse wrote: >=20 > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:05:58PM -0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 13:10 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> > > >> >> Note that you are not describing a normal "DT scenario" here. You a= re > >> >> describing a case in which we screwed up > >> > > >> > AKA "real world" > >> > >> No. Absolutely not. That was a screwup, and it needs to be *rare*. The > >> excuses you present for it are crappy and uunacceptable. > > > > That's not helping. The fact is that is has happened. >=20 > It has happened, yes. But we're describing how things *shall* work going > forward. Coping with existing mistakes is a slightly separate issue. > (Albeit only slightly since mistakes *will* continue to happen, but > hopefully more rarely so our defined processes for coping are based on the > assumption that it should be rare) Agreed. Thierry --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSaTDoAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOh7FIP/RwZrp5/U1ck4OOCm5H9sEEj 0KHjsmJY3x4HZ58MRom1h4kCqzP5RCI4FPH1y34wBG7lnnV90p+wR5s5qS6Y0JII 7wmTaMpBa46FxGHJkJcR4e0KUGCs/g8Lu7LpGwZWJmVAIld73vaIiFwyX8QS8BaW AxbkvkgaUVb9E+iIQhWyliWyWp0DNq6Lff4ulm9hY1sn9HcSnWOd7xKgh42VWpli qWV0IxpWnh3HmVBsP3Fe3QfJO/8fY5U06F9Oglucjg1Xg0z9I4QJyDRO3eEIpW5Z A+aL/8q/S8zO9xGok0dqlw6LsZSHBdH8nwLxTR6gmXbxhvEq78y3dnXF3txF73FM Nc8a72zkAbB5bba+tC+fwBJLrXSmrXhD/IklQl4dghWA82I6P6GNDmq9qn+37vkX 4+2cDiq7RYLlkbawacbE62HGE4KX3kc3PH7XZAuseWCrv9lR6m42Tv4F9CmInuM7 jBdYsO3pWkevBM5lKyWlStHznn+0hVF3ep4n0NntuwDtj889nErlReeRMUrFf833 72fHY+6QQZskzPvv5x3xwmXayOoWkmdbmBpXuBRvquOTQOZqWA4W5BSGw1xwecgq 7xnhzwOYAiCRvo5H56qNjV7Ef8Uf29DdB8tws8jqouN2pZAdZb/ZpeAue1aEebST Xw+oQ1xfNElXHttFQcXI =lrLg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html