From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better? Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:58:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20131024145855.GD9044@ulmo.nvidia.com> References: <20131024095232.27BBCC4039D@trevor.secretlab.ca> <1382614439.6040.16.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <1382615278.8522.72.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20131024122346.GD11296@ulmo.nvidia.com> <1382619655.6040.52.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <516bfc7f9366ff3ef9187c36dd160888.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org> <20131024141241.GA25061@ulmo.nvidia.com> <99db70b50b3ddcf20d940d5855c657e0.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org> <20131024142347.GD25061@ulmo.nvidia.com> <818aaae744e58e37c6641d41912d0ba2.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <818aaae744e58e37c6641d41912d0ba2.squirrel-fWAbwA/6YHlc2C7mugBRk2EX/6BAtgUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: David Woodhouse Cc: mbizon-MmRyKUhfbQ9GWvitb5QawA@public.gmane.org, Grant Likely , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , ksummit-2013-discuss-cunTk1MwBs98uUxBSJOaYoYkZiVZrdSR2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org, Nicolas Pitre , Jason Gunthorpe , Matt Porter , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:38:16PM -0000, David Woodhouse wrote: >=20 > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:22:06PM -0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> > >> > Experimental bindings could be a suitable temporary measure, but > >> perhaps > >> > other, better solutions exist. > >> > >> Yes, unstable bindings are part of the currently-documented plan. You > >> are > >> not expected to need it as a matter of course, but that facility will > >> exist. > > > > Can you point me to the documented plan? I must have missed it. >=20 > It's not quite out there yet. >=20 > It was thrashed out in the ARM summit yesterday, and Grant and I will be > polishing the draft tonight before presenting it to the Kernel Summit > tomorrow. Okay, that's great. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help push this forward. Thierry --u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSaTWvAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhUuMP/0rt+r6uEdoiTLSAoGLtIjRp OSornYi9hO3qG1i3EmLkJO3zPtO+3Svc3t9V3kXKBwuZzIeokdbCrsUwj1xwY9n0 1EFl+4zCFE+LVwArsQosX7EdOKsrK3YMsmet/rlM6OyNUAelZupuSq2o1Me+5arT EfV/GHWYdyrinZBthZbrF6ZBVCjdHuyslTvsBGoOoBbStmW30NgoclF1H03TUWlN JnjIqbw962IG57XTP161ezGnjPOPXYsDPkDacITKjbQ52t6jvXRxOADppfK7P4kc oknxrtl+s/d+GArVNPzIGN/AfGUC+igwWKGIfw8kK9J1lJAVXdj1AwDfjAON1NZb coe3giqvowkSKNwshEo7I9uWG4q2synkWsTcqQV4gp75T4DKSmAWUbcTuaoR6OWB Q6cfYy3XVpm3al4EA5Mn5RGfoUAh2tVT8DDXgdMfvv0dQ+EzvEWN/dqihyjEjqzg M6ixQBrwNci1LeHJBs1ng9sfSnnMyGI/rsSv5+rBlqTBLLuUo4FwFU8tLNkUZmQY 2ND/XjRy6zlk/wcqBuh3w5gOyuDOaaR8Smm7EDjR68y6eVQvKPbVvdmb4fkFJcwt KuSJX+FKZfI9oYQ4JpVoZIf4EJegGf38lhdW3v6696v2Eo0el68BpHEtUXJ5xC0T FLwjsI/iDWM9BvmNWS0Z =EvRm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html