From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: i.MX53: dts for Voipac x53-dmm-668 module Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:27:28 +0800 Message-ID: <20131025012725.GG14529@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <1382461643-16790-1-git-send-email-lisovy@gmail.com> <1382461643-16790-4-git-send-email-lisovy@gmail.com> <20131023072738.GI2839@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <1382641926.16515.2.camel@lolumad> <1382644733.19373.2.camel@lolumad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1382644733.19373.2.camel@lolumad> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Rostislav Lisovy Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Matt Sealey , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Sascha Hauer , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:58:53PM +0200, Rostislav Lisovy wrote: > I saw that most of the vendor prefixes are somehow shortened (e.g. > Freescale -- fsl, etc.). The 'fsl' is the stock symbol of Freescale. If that's not the case for voipac, I think 'voipac' is more appropriate. Shawn > On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 14:49 -0500, Matt Sealey wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Rostislav Lisovy wrote: > > > Dear Shawn; > > > Thank you for your comments. > > > Should I also add Voipac to > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt? > > > > I would agree with that, but why is your chosen prefix "vp" instead of > > "voipac" anyway? > > > >