From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] edac: Document Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver binding Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 22:06:45 -0700 Message-ID: <20131029050645.GC21983@codeaurora.org> References: <1383006690-6754-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1383006690-6754-5-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20131029013454.GJ4763@kartoffel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131029013454.GJ4763@kartoffel> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Rutland Cc: "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/28, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:31:28AM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > + > > +Optional properties: > > +- interrupt-names: Should contain the interrupt names "l1_irq" and > > + "l2_irq" > > As with my comment on the parsing code, I'd prefer that if interrupt-names was > present it defined the order of interrupts. Otherwise it's redundant and of no > value. > > Otherwise, the binding looks fine to me: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland How about I just drop the interrupt-names property? It isn't adding much and is a holdover from the vendor kernel. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation