From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 - V2] Introducing Device Tree Overlays Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 21:41:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20131106204143.GD8662@breakpoint.cc> References: <1383676898-29819-1-git-send-email-panto@antoniou-consulting.com> <20131106190152.GA8662@breakpoint.cc> <20131106203102.GB8662@breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131106203102.GB8662@breakpoint.cc> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pantelis Antoniou Cc: Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Stephen Warren , Matt Porter , Koen Kooi , Alison Chaiken , Dinh Nguyen , Jan Lubbe , Alexander Sverdlin , Michael Stickel , Guenter Roeck , Dirk Behme , Alan Tull , Sascha Hauer , Michael Bohan , Ionut Nicu , Michal Simek , Matt Ranostay , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 06.11.13, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > It has been discussed. > > > > We are doing it because Please don't get me wrong. I am not against this, I am just curious why this needs to be done at runtime and bootloader time is not an option. Sebastian