From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] dt: Document sata_rcar bindings Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 18:01:35 +0900 Message-ID: <20131108090126.GA9467@verge.net.au> References: <1383854642-21660-1-git-send-email-valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com> <1383854642-21660-3-git-send-email-valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com> <7820946.JfD46VSKC7@avalon> <874n7nquh4.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874n7nquh4.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Valentine Barshak , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Guennadi Liakhovetski , Kumar Gala , Tejun Heo , Vladimir Barinov , Sergei Shtylyov , Mark Rutland List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:27:08PM -0800, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Hi Laurent, Simon > > One question > > > > +- interrupts : must consist of one interrupt specifier. > > > + > > > +Example: > > > + > > > +sata: sata@fc600000 { > > > + compatible = "renesas,sata-r8a7779"; > > > + reg = <0xfc600000 0x2000>; > > > + interrupt-parent = <&gic>; > > > + interrupts = <0 100 0x4>; > > > > Please use IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH instead of 0x4. > > Now, our many SoC codes are using 0x4 in "interrupts". > Do you think we should use IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH ? Personally I think that would be nice.