From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: cros ec: spi: Add delay for raising CS Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:36:54 +0000 Message-ID: <20131125103654.GE17722@lee--X1> References: <1385143550-31901-1-git-send-email-treding@nvidia.com> <20131125094503.GD17722@lee--X1> <20131125100834.GH22043@ulmo.nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131125100834.GH22043-AwZRO8vwLAwmlAP/+Wk3EA@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Samuel Ortiz , Bernie Thompson , Andrew Bresticker , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Rhyland Klein , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:45:03AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Thierry Reding wrote: > [...] > > > static int cros_ec_probe_spi(struct spi_device *spi) > >=20 > > Can you send a pre-patch to fix this too please: > > static int cros_ec_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi) >=20 > I just noticed that we should probably do the same for .remove(), whi= ch > uses the same convention. >=20 > While at it, do you want me to make the same changes for cros_ec_i2c.= c > as well? If the same issue exists there, then yes please. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html