From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 1/3] ARM: dts: Add pmu sysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:48:53 -0800 Message-ID: <20131207004853.GA2966@roeck-us.net> References: <1386308868-30264-1-git-send-email-l.krishna@samsung.com> <1386308868-30264-2-git-send-email-l.krishna@samsung.com> <20131206194709.GA14464@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Doug Anderson Cc: Leela Krishna Amudala , linux-samsung-soc , Wim Van Sebroeck , Kukjin Kim , Tomasz Figa , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" , "cpgs ." List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:01:23PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > Guenter, > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:17:46AM +0530, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote: > >> This patch adds pmusysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files to > >> handle PMU register accesses in a centralized way using syscon driver > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala > >> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa > >> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson > >> Tested-by: Doug Anderson > > > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck > > I'm curious of your opinion of Sylwester's requests, since your Ack > came in after his requests. Would you like to see a respin of this, > or do you think it's gone through enough spinning and are thinking it > would go in as-is? > My Ack means "I am ok with this patch without further changes". My reaction to the new comments was along the line of "sigh". Whoever comments now had more than 10 chances to comment earlier, which should have been way enough, and thus deserves to be ignored. Sorry if that statement happens to offend any listener, but I am not really known for my patience. Guenter