From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] I2C: EMMA Mobile I2C master driver Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:59:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20131211115908.GA2564@katana> References: <1377688911-10911-1-git-send-email-ian.molton@codethink.co.uk> <1378226969-18722-1-git-send-email-ian.molton@codethink.co.uk> <1378226969-18722-2-git-send-email-ian.molton@codethink.co.uk> <20130905060429.GJ14960@verge.net.au> <20130925044503.GA24243@verge.net.au> <52A23916.40507@codethink.co.uk> <20131211020904.GK19992@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131211020904.GK19992@verge.net.au> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Simon Horman Cc: Ian Molton , magnus.damm@gmail.com, grant.likely@linaro.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:09:04AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 08:52:38PM +0000, Ian Molton wrote: > > On 25/09/13 05:45, Simon Horman wrote: > >=20 > > >Hi Ian, > > > > > >I spoke with Magnus and in turn Ben about this at LinuxCon in New Orle= ans > > >last week. > > > > > >Basically the position of Magnus and I is that any support for this > > >hardware is an incremental improvement on the current situation: no > > >support. > > > > > >With this in mind from an shmobile point of view I am happy for this c= ode. > > >And there is no need to wait for a review from Magnus. > >=20 > > Has anyone merged this for upstream yet? If not, where should I send it? >=20 > I don't believe it has been merged. >=20 > My suggestion is to re-post it with my Ack with > Wolfram Sang CCed. No need to resend. I have it on my todo-list. Yet, by glimpsing at it I found some issues which need a proper review for which I didn't have the time so far. I hope to have it done by this week. --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSqFOLAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2g8EQAKLaVHmD70LiNCZc8G72nwOk bn32/mjbLGT3+XoPgfnyD6BibJKYcqGXx9SAUsvNCUca27b8r668jLrs2XLNx9M+ tqQl9hsrPttszrW9hDwhab3M1dtuURxQ7YDwrBK9gFhR4pGUAlJw4Kq1KgSp9r68 05LAJBHD9ilDS9iLAt6OZMUjX6PBNjgNySpiKtyDLMSnxjhAN2mOfZbwUogfwgxI NsqKy19d4qDOIkve+M9q+rU5Zi2NNkqkx0e9kDR0rYDoAITHb61z7NNHmvuViqyH u4p7JVrX6DsfohQqeOfOe9bMi3eZBzCZN7drh0PIk32rLOxnzylTByDFSvcRhpc9 JejNuE+Q9zE3c+pp0uUaJ8eEQ2LW+TlgjMfAac1Il3yqR8UAYVSe1/XODntxSxn0 BxMAsQzJJ2peHH99QyoPmeJGnxgYu4wsEsmcy3oPf7uCIot+LVGXqLOtAa4FLR5F K8creWTo1BTM4Y67+rOj3P9069aFbAer77FtWl04osZJZJBCWc76YnX+TzdLTALu bx8lattyXSLTCjkJCGJAO+2aH/FbamfoM5DKyrpYjRMdcG1A6ffT4m3hdGV4fJXG vwSh4vpToxurjruuYHDRC7v5RhA0FelQ1mrUAexxwlNhDsRJEbiW0PdQ6NtT5NMb V76QLBoncd6r7nOvXSAF =iQyL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--