From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] rtc: Add support for Intersil ISL12057 I2C RTC chip Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:37:06 -0800 Message-ID: <20131216213706.GA8527@roeck-us.net> References: <1dec5992db795b61e91e0abf910dee7fce322ccc.1387227955.git.arno@natisbad.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1dec5992db795b61e91e0abf910dee7fce322ccc.1387227955.git.arno@natisbad.org> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnaud Ebalard Cc: Mark Rutland , Alessandro Zummo , Peter Huewe , Linus Walleij , Thierry Reding , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Grant Likely , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Rob Landley , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Jason Cooper , Jason Gunthorpe , Kumar Gala , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:17:47PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: > > Intersil ISL12057 I2C RTC chip also supports two alarms. This patch > only adds support for basic RTC functionalities (i.e. getting and > setting time). Tests have been performed on NETGEAR ReadyNAS 102 w/ > startup/shutdown scripts, hwclock, ntpdate and openntpd. > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Ebalard Here is a snippet from the saved patch: obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_IMXDI) +=3D rtc-imxdi.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_ISL1208) +=3D rtc-isl1208.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_ISL12022) +=3D rtc-isl12022.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_ISL12057) +=3D rtc-isl12057.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_JZ4740) +=3D rtc-jz4740.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_LP8788) +=3D rtc-lp8788.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_LPC32XX) +=3D rtc-lpc32xx.o Something is adding those '3D' after each '=' into the patch. On a side note, even though it is hard to see, it seems you use two spaces instead of a tab above, and that you do the same with other defines (unless the mailer replaced tabs with spaces). In general, the widely used form for defines is #defineMY_DEFINEdefinition/* this is a comment */ Also, I think +static struct i2c_driver isl12057_driver; is unnecessary. But I'd really like to have a closer look again after you fixed the =3D issue ... Thanks, Guenter