From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] clk: max77686: Clock provider implementation fixes Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 11:06:04 +0000 Message-ID: <20140106110604.GN23772@lee--X1> References: <1386864441-19561-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <20131231194215.12054.39705@quantum> <2890647.PEOApIOYyP@amdc1227> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2890647.PEOApIOYyP@amdc1227> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz Figa Cc: Mike Turquette , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz , Sachin Kamat , Kyungmin Park List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > > > This series intends to improve clock provider impementation of ma= x77686 > > > PMIC driver. First two patches are simple fixes of current implem= entation > > > to allow correct control of provided clocks. Further patches refa= ctor > > > the driver to make the code cleaner and prepare for further patch= es. Then > > > last two patches add registration of OF clock provider and adjust= device > > > tree nodes of boards containing max77686 chip to contain properti= es > > > required by clock provider. > >=20 > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette >=20 > Hmm... Shouldn't this series go through the clk tree directly? If not= , who > should be taking it? I'm not quite sure why this patch-set was sent to me in the first place, but I guess that's by the by. Mike is probably waiting for the ARM and DT patches to be Acked, applied. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog