From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] clk: max77686: Clock provider implementation fixes
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 09:59:39 -0800
Message-ID: <20140108175939.27803.30462@quantum>
References: <1386864441-19561-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com>
 <2890647.PEOApIOYyP@amdc1227> <20140108163138.27803.58310@quantum>
 <3008563.6S2kFjQKp9@amdc1227> <20140108171544.GC14575@lee--X1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140108171544.GC14575@lee--X1>
Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

Quoting Lee Jones (2014-01-08 09:15:44)
> > I believe Lee has already applied this one, but in future, to avoid=
 such
> > confusion, if it's more convenient for you, I can send you any cloc=
k
> > series as pull requests.
>=20
> Me? I haven't applied any clk patches.

I have taken patches 1-7 into clk-next just now. I can take patch #8 as
well but it would probably be better to send it through arm-soc?

Regards,
Mike

>=20
> --=20
> Lee Jones
> Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
> Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog