From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Turquette Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: k3: remove clk_table Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:56:31 -0800 Message-ID: <20140117225631.4167.47840@quantum> References: <1389604469-8064-1-git-send-email-zhangfei.gao@linaro.org> <1389604469-8064-3-git-send-email-zhangfei.gao@linaro.org> <002b01cf1115$4cdfe240$e69fa6c0$%jun@samsung.com> <86sism7iuz.fsf@void.printf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Seungwon Jeon , Chris Ball Cc: Seungwon Jeon , Zhangfei Gao , Arnd Bergmann , Jaehoon Chung , Haojian Zhuang , brooke.wangzhigang@huawei.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Quoting Seungwon Jeon (2014-01-17 08:10:23) > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Jan 14 2014, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > > > On Monday, January 13, 2014, Zhangfei Gao wrote: > > >> Remove clk_table and directly use ios->clock as clock source rate. > > >> Abstract init clock rate and max clock limitation in clk.c > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao > > > > > > Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon > > > > It looks like patch 1/2 did not make 3.14. Do you want me to take > > this patch for 3.14 anyway? (Why?) > Yes, I hope that it would be merged this time. > I think that this change should have been applied to (036f29: mmc: > dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3 for k3 platform) originally. Oops, I just read this mail. I have taken in patch #1 through the clk tree but have not yet pushed it out to my public mirror. Chris, I'm happy to take it if you haven't yet. Regards, Mike > > Thanks, > sw-j