From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] DT: net: davinci_emac: "phy-handle" property is actually optional Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:04:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20140119.200411.1357790885368672921.davem@davemloft.net> References: <201401170132.14479.sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201401170132.14479.sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, rob@landley.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org From: Sergei Shtylyov Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 01:32:13 +0300 > Though described as required, the "phy-handle" property for the DaVinci EMAC > binding is actually optional, as the driver will happily function without it, > assuming 100/FULL link; the property is not specified either in the example > device node, or in the actual EMAC device nodes for DA850 and AM3517 device > trees. > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov Applied.