From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: PWM... Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:39:22 +0900 Message-ID: <20140121003922.GA31997@verge.net.au> References: <20140119164956.GR15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140119193026.GS15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201401192126.41543.arnd@arndb.de> <20140120001446.GD9752@verge.net.au> <20140120161147.GS17314@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140120161147.GS17314@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , "arm@kernel.org" , Arnd Bergmann , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Thierry Reding , Olof Johansson , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:11:47PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:14:46AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 09:26:40PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > Right: if you change an existing dts file from #pwm-cells=<2> to > > > #pwm-cells=<3>, that requires changing all references to the pwm > > > Would this change imply that old dtbs would no longer work with new kernels? > > So long as the code can still handle both values for #pwm-cells existing > DTBs should work fine. Thanks, as long as that is the case I have no objections at this time.