From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] DT: net: davinci_emac: couple more properties actually optional Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 23:43:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20140128.234315.2164810932256158473.davem@davemloft.net> References: <201401280245.35745.sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201401280245.35745.sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, rob@landley.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org From: Sergei Shtylyov Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 02:45:34 +0300 > Though described as required, couple more properties in the DaVinci EMAC > binding are actually optional, as the driver will happily function without them. > The patchset is against DaveM's 'net.git' tree this time. > > [1/2] DT: net: davinci_emac: "ti,davinci-rmii-en" property is actually optional > [2/2] DT: net: davinci_emac: "ti,davinci-no-bd-ram" property is actually optional Series applied with the "has/have" thing fixed. Thanks.