From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [patch] mmc: omap_hsmmc: precedence bug in omap_hsmmc_context_restore() Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:15:26 +0300 Message-ID: <20140130121526.GO4815@mwanda> References: <20130822125613.GB2543@elgon.mountain> <52162444.1050908@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52162444.1050908@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Balaji T K Cc: Chris Ball , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:16:28PM +0530, Balaji T K wrote: > On Thursday 22 August 2013 06:26 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >'!' has higher precedence than '&' so this doesn't work as intended > >although since RESETDONE is 1 it would work if none of the other bits > >are set. > > > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for the patch, Indeed other bits are reserved. > however ... > > >Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > >--- > >Untested. > > > >diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > >index 1865321..7346b15 100644 > >--- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > >+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > >@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_context_restore(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host) > > if (host->context_loss == context_loss) > > return 1; > > > >- if (!OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSSTATUS) & RESETDONE) > >+ if (!(OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSSTATUS) & RESETDONE)) > > return 1; > > This check is unnecessary, will send a patch to remove this. What happened with this? regards, dan carpenter