From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Turquette Subject: Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: configuration of parent clocks and clock frequency Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:06:14 -0800 Message-ID: <20140201030614.9977.80501@quantum> References: <52DE6CAB.10008@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <52DE6CAB.10008-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sylwester Nawrocki , linux-arm-kernel , devicetree Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Tomasz Figa , Kyungmin Park , Marek Szyprowski , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2014-01-21 04:48:43) > 5. Similarly to the regulator bindings the clock names could be appended > to name of a DT property: > > [clk_name]-assigned-clock-parent = <...>; > [clk_name]-assigned-clock-rate = <...>; I have always been partial to the way that the reg framework does its [reg_name]-supply. We could shorten it to something like: [clk-name]-asn-parent = .... [clk-name]-asn-rate = ... This is actually the format that was discussed at the ARM kernel summit IIRC. Regards, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html