From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Turquette Subject: Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: configuration of parent clocks and clock frequency Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 08:43:05 -0800 Message-ID: <20140206164305.22158.43488@quantum> References: <52DE6CAB.10008@samsung.com> <20140201030614.9977.80501@quantum> <52F0DA07.6050903@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <52F0DA07.6050903-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Marek Szyprowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , linux-arm-kernel , devicetree Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Tomasz Figa , Kyungmin Park , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Quoting Marek Szyprowski (2014-02-04 04:16:07) > Hello, > > On 2014-02-01 04:06, Mike Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2014-01-21 04:48:43) > > > 5. Similarly to the regulator bindings the clock names could be appended > > > to name of a DT property: > > > > > > [clk_name]-assigned-clock-parent = <...>; > > > [clk_name]-assigned-clock-rate = <...>; > > > > I have always been partial to the way that the reg framework does its > > [reg_name]-supply. We could shorten it to something like: > > > > [clk-name]-asn-parent = .... > > [clk-name]-asn-rate = ... > > > > This is actually the format that was discussed at the ARM kernel summit > > IIRC. > > I think that "[clk-name]-clk-parent" and "[clk-name]-clk-rate" will be a bit > more descriptive names instead of quite ambiguous "asn". +1 Regards, Mike > > Best regards > -- > Marek Szyprowski, PhD > Samsung R&D Institute Poland > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html